Background/Case Studies: Blood product administration has traditionally been used by air medical and advanced interfacility EMS but is a relatively new interventionfor ground-basedemergency response agencies. Existingliterature demonstratesthat out-of-hospital blood transfusion is a safe and effective strategy for reducing morbidity and mortality.This study characterizesout-of-hospital blood transfusion practices for air, interfacility, and ground-based EMS agencies.
Study
Design/Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of blood product administrations in 2024 using NEMSIS data. EMS activations were included if EMS clinicians administered one of the following types of blood products in the out-of-hospital setting: transfusion of platelets, whole blood, albumin, fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, packed red blood cells, or administration of an unspecifiedblood product. Frequency distributions were calculated to characterize patient demographics, cause of injury, clinical impressions and symptoms, and attributes of the EMS agencies. We analyzed measures of central tendency for vital signs recorded before and after transfusion, quantifying the magnitude and direction of change, and assessed transfusion-related complications
Results/Findings: 60,525,710 records, submitted by 14,640 EMS agencies from50 States, DC, and 3 U.S. Territories were included in the analysis. Out-of-hospital blood transfusions were documented in 21,160records(.03%). Of these, 84% (n=17,710) were administeredduring interfacility transfers, and 48% (n=10,064) were provided by ground-basedEMS clinicians.Patient demographics show that6% (1,202) of blood transfusions were administered to pediatric patients(<18 years old). EMS clinicians documented injuries in 16% (n=3,396) of transfused patients. The primary causes of injury were motor vehicle crashes (11% [2,320])andinter-personal violence (8% [1,674]). For medical patients, the most frequent clinical impressions were gastrointestinal bleeding(22%,[4,824]),obstetrical emergencies(2.9% [605]), altered mental status(1.8% [384]), andsepsis (1.4%[291]). For ground-based emergency responses administering blood, the initial recorded vital signs showed a mean systolic blood pressure of74 mmHg, a mean heart rate of 68 beats per minute, and a mean shock index of 0.91.End-tidal carbon dioxide was documented in 52% (n=10955) of these cases, with a mean value of28 mmHg. Conclusions: These findings underscore the critical role and increasing utilization of out-of-hospital blood transfusion, as well as the utility of a large and comprehensive national EMS database in monitoringthese interventionsacross the United States.Continued collection and analysis of EMS data related to blood transfusions will provide essential insights for optimizing clinical practice, enhancing EMS and blood supplier operations, andadvancing our understanding of how these interventions impact outcomes.